Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Zooba is in the top 2% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Zooba performance in the Saudi Arabia and how they change over time
See what factors influence Zooba performance in the Saudi Arabia and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Zooba' competitors in the Saudi Arabia
An analysis of Zooba' competitors in the Saudi Arabia
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market Performance shows brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Zooba, with a MARKET PERFORMANCE of 98 in Saudi Arabia's Cafe & Restaurants industry, is a leading brand (top 2%). This percentile indicates a strong market position and high customer preference relative to peers like Dar Mubarak, WBJ, Mr. Broast Restaurant - MR.broast®, نصف شواية - الستين, مطعم أرنون and CAFE L'OCCITANE, all positioned at the same percentile.
Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) reflects brand perception. Monitoring CSAT helps refine services and improve customer loyalty to drive long-term growth.
Zooba's overall CSAT in Saudi Arabia is 86%, a decrease of 5.7 percentage points year-over-year. Eastern Province shows a higher CSAT (90%) than Riyadh Region (82%). A CSAT dynamic data shows decrease in CSAT in May 2025, so the brand needs to investigate the reasons and improve service quality.
Average Check is the typical amount customers spend per visit. Monitoring this metric reveals customer spending habits and revenue trends.
Zooba's overall average check is 86.5 SAR, a decrease of 4.1% year-over-year. Riyadh Region has an average check of 87.6 SAR, while Eastern Province has 84.8 SAR. Average check dynamic data indicates volatility, brands need to investigate the reasons and come up with customer retention programs.
Number of Outlets indicates brand reach. Tracking outlet counts reveals expansion efforts and their geographic distribution.
Zooba has 2 outlets in Eastern Province and 2 outlets in Riyadh Region in Saudi Arabia. The brand should consider expansion to increase reach and market presence within Saudi Arabia.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals. Understanding cross-visitation patterns helps refine marketing strategies and differentiate the brand.
Top competitors for Zooba in Saudi Arabia, based on cross-visitation, are McDonald's (6.74%), Dunkin' (6.22%), Half Million (5.18%), Al Romansiah (5.18%), and Kudu (4.66%). Zooba should monitor these brands and develop strategies to attract their customers.
Traffic Workload by hours highlights peak traffic. Analyzing workload helps optimize staffing and resource allocation for efficient service.
Zooba's traffic workload peaks between 21:00 and 23:00, reaching its highest point at 67.29% at 23:00. Lowest workload is between 2:00 and 6:00. The brand should consider adjusting staffing levels to match traffic patterns throughout the day.
Consumer Segments highlight demographic strengths. Understanding consumer affinity informs targeted marketing and improves customer engagement.
Zooba's consumer base shows high affinity towards women (96), slightly under-indexed compared to the average. Zooba's consumer base shows Gen Y (145) demonstrating a high affinity. These values aren’t percentages but indices relative to the average consumer (100).