Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Sushi Master is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Sushi Master performance in the Ukraine and how they change over time
See what factors influence Sushi Master performance in the Ukraine and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Sushi Master' competitors in the Ukraine
An analysis of Sushi Master' competitors in the Ukraine
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance reveals brand strength, reflecting customer preference and competitive standing within the Cafe & Restaurants industry.
Sushi Master, with a market performance of 99, is a leading brand. This high percentile means Sushi Master captures a significant share of customer traffic, indicating strong brand preference and competitive advantage. Performance peers include DonVito, Musafir, Піцерія IQ Pizza, Gaga, Татар Бунар, and I Love Kebab.
CSAT reflects how happy customers are with the brand. Monitoring this KPI helps the brand to improve and retain customers.
Sushi Master's overall CSAT is 74%, a 29.5 percentage point increase year-over-year. Volyn Oblast shows the highest CSAT at 95%, with Khmelnytskyi Oblast at 94%. Cherkasy and Chernihiv Oblasts both have a CSAT of 92%, while Kharkiv Oblast has a CSAT of 84%. This indicates overall improvement in customer satisfaction across regions.
Average check is a key indicator of customer spending, reflecting menu pricing, order size, and overall revenue generation per customer.
The overall average check is not available. Kharkiv Oblast leads with an average check of 602.4 UAH. Lviv Oblast follows with 582.5 UAH, and Dnipropetrovsk Oblast with 580.8 UAH. Odesa Oblast has an average check of 538.5 UAH, and Sumy Oblast 496.9 UAH. This showcases regional variations in customer spending.
Outlet count indicates brand reach. Monitoring outlet distribution provides insights into expansion strategy and market penetration.
Sushi Master has 14 outlets in Kyiv Oblast, the highest number. Dnipropetrovsk Oblast has 8 outlets, while Zaporizhia Oblast has 5. Donetsk, Kharkiv, Khmelnytskyi, and Odesa Oblasts each have 3 outlets. Volyn and Chernihiv Oblasts and Poltava Oblast each have 2 outlets. This shows outlet presence across Ukraine.
Competitor analysis identifies key players attracting similar customers, helping to refine marketing and competitive strategies.
McDonald's is the top competitor with a cross-visitation rate of 6.98%. Osama sushi has a cross-visitation rate of 4.65%, while KFC has 3.49%. Sushi Story and Domino's Pizza both have a cross-visitation rate of 2.91%. This identifies primary competitors for Sushi Master.
Traffic workload analysis helps to optimize staffing, promotions, and resource allocation according to peak and off-peak hours.
Traffic workload is highest between 10 AM and 9 PM, peaking between 4 PM and 6 PM (54.09% - 54.73%). Traffic is minimal between midnight and 9 AM. This indicates the need for higher staffing levels during peak hours.
Understanding consumer segments allows the brand to tailor marketing efforts, and to improve product and service offerings.
Women are over-indexed (103), indicating a slightly higher affinity for Sushi Master. Men are under-indexed (96). Gen Z is significantly over-indexed (206), showing a strong affinity. Gen X (74) and Gen Y (54) are under-indexed, suggesting lower relative engagement.