Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Saboten is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Saboten performance in the Japan and how they change over time
See what factors influence Saboten performance in the Japan and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Saboten' competitors in the Japan
An analysis of Saboten' competitors in the Japan
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Saboten is a leading brand with a market performance percentile of 99 in Japan's Cafe & Restaurants industry, indicating it captures a significant share of customer traffic. The performancePeers within the same range are numerous, including 'A5 Wagyu Yakiniku PANGA Ueno branch | Tokyo halal restaurant', 'OKOGE Umeda', 'fried rice and noodles', 'Steak Rice Center Beef Japanese Rice Bowl', '炭炉ばた こみ哉 松山', and '個室居酒屋 海鮮×焼き鳥 なごみ 梅田店'.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects customer happiness. Monitoring CSAT helps identify areas for improvement and strengthens brand loyalty.
Saboten's overall CSAT is 75%, a decrease of 2.5 percentage points year-over-year. CSAT varies by region, with Saitama Prefecture showing the highest satisfaction (91%, up 2.9pp) and Aichi Prefecture showing 83% (down 3.5pp). Chiba (78%, up 6.8pp), Kanagawa (77%, up 0.6pp), and Fukuoka (73%, up 0.1pp) also vary.
Average check reflects spending per customer. Tracking this KPI helps understand revenue trends and optimize pricing strategies.
Saboten's overall average check is 1.7K JPY, an increase of 10.1% year-over-year. Average check varies by region: Chiba Prefecture shows 2.8K JPY, Fukuoka Prefecture 2.6K JPY, and Aichi Prefecture 1.2K JPY. These differences suggest regional pricing or menu variations.
Number of outlets indicates brand reach. Tracking this metric shows expansion and market presence within regions.
Saboten has a varying number of outlets across different prefectures. Kanagawa Prefecture leads with 41 outlets, followed by Aichi Prefecture with 28, and Saitama Prefecture with 27. Chiba Prefecture has 20, and Shizuoka Prefecture has 10. Osaka and Miyagi Prefectures each have 7 outlets.
Competitor analysis reveals competitive landscape. Tracking top competitors helps identify opportunities and benchmark against rivals.
Saboten's top competitors based on cross-visitation are Starbucks (13.08%), McDonald's (9.81%), Komeda's Coffee (7.48%), Doutor (7.48%), and Mister Donut (7.01%). These brands attract a portion of Saboten's customer base, highlighting the competitive overlap in the cafe & restaurant industry.
Traffic workload shows peak operational hours. Tracking helps optimize staffing, resource allocation, and service efficiency.
Saboten experiences peak traffic between 10:00 and 20:00, with the highest workload around 12:00 to 18:00. Traffic gradually increases from 7:00, peaks in the afternoon, and declines after 20:00. Understanding these patterns enables optimized staffing.
Understanding consumer segments inform marketing. This insight shows differences across demographics and targets the relevant customers.
Saboten's consumer base shows slight over-representation of women (affinity index 101), while men are slightly under-represented (affinity index 100). Generationally, Gen X is highly over-represented (affinity index 130), whereas Gen Y (81) and Gen Z (77) are under-represented.