Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Sabi Sushi is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Sabi Sushi performance in the Norway and how they change over time
See what factors influence Sabi Sushi performance in the Norway and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Sabi Sushi' competitors in the Norway
An analysis of Sabi Sushi' competitors in the Norway
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Sabi Sushi's market performance is at the 99th percentile, marking it as a leading brand in Norway's Cafe & Restaurants industry. This shows significant customer preference. Peers like Oslo Street Food, Maaemo, Sild & Salmon, JOE & THE JUICE, Miyako, and Jamal’s falafel share this top-tier performance.
Customer Satisfaction (CSAT) is a key indicator of customer loyalty and overall brand perception, influencing repeat business and positive word-of-mouth.
Sabi Sushi's overall CSAT is 73%, a decrease of 4.4 percentage points year-over-year. Vestland shows high satisfaction at 89%, while Rogaland is lower at 53%. The CSAT trend decreased from 78.81% in April to 65.71% in June, signalling a possible decline in customer experience that warrants investigation.
Average Check reflects customer spending per visit, directly impacting revenue and indicating the perceived value of the brand's offerings.
The overall average check for Sabi Sushi is 434.3 NOK, a 12.1% increase year-over-year. Rogaland's average check is 461.3 NOK. The average check decreased from 454.35 NOK in April to 430.00 NOK in June, which needs attention to identify if the customer's order value dropped.
Number of Outlets indicates brand reach and market presence, affecting accessibility and overall revenue potential across different regions.
Sabi Sushi has a total of 30 outlets. The majority of outlets are located in Rogaland (15), followed by Trøndelag (3) and Akershus (3). The distribution across other counties such as Vestland, Buskerud, Viken, Vestfold og Telemark, and Agder is relatively sparse.
Analyzing competitors identifies key players and customer preferences, which is crucial for strategic positioning and competitive advantage in the market.
The top competitors for Sabi Sushi, based on customer cross-visitation, include McDonald's (14.04%), Burger King (5.26%), The Shack (5.26%), Egon (5.26%), and Sabrura Sticks & Sushi (5.26%). McDonald's has significantly higher cross-visitation, suggesting a broader customer base.
Traffic Workload highlights peak operational times, enabling optimal staffing and resource allocation to enhance customer service and efficiency.
Sabi Sushi's traffic workload peaks between 16:00 and 18:00, with the highest workload at 46.57% at 17:00. Traffic is minimal between 0:00 and 10:00. This data informs staffing and resource planning to handle peak hours effectively.
Understanding consumer segments enables targeted marketing, enhancing relevance and effectiveness by catering to specific demographic preferences.
Sabi Sushi's customer base shows high affinity among women (113) and Gen X (158) and Gen Z (142), indicating they are overrepresented compared to the average consumer. Men (94) and Gen Y (78) show a lower affinity index, suggesting they are underrepresented.