Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Ramen Shifu is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Ramen Shifu performance in the Portugal and how they change over time
See what factors influence Ramen Shifu performance in the Portugal and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Ramen Shifu' competitors in the Portugal
An analysis of Ramen Shifu' competitors in the Portugal
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance reveals brand strength, reflecting customer preference and competitive edge in the cafe and restaurant industry.
Ramen Shifu is a leading brand in Portugal's Cafe & Restaurants industry, ranking in the top 1% based on foot traffic. This indicates a strong market presence and high customer preference relative to peers like Lupita, NOA Café, O Rio Marisqueira Belém, Sakura, Galeto, and Este Oeste.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects loyalty, influencing brand perception and repeat business, which are vital for sustainable growth.
Ramen Shifu's overall CSAT is 90%, a significant 12.2 percentage point increase year-over-year. Lisbon shows a high CSAT of 97% with a 19.4pp increase, while Porto has a CSAT of 86% with a 4.8pp decrease. Overall CSAT has fluctuated between 87.5% and 95.12% from April to June 2025.
Average check reflects spending per customer, crucial for revenue optimization and understanding customer purchase behavior and pricing effectiveness.
Ramen Shifu's average check is 17.8 EUR, up 1.1% year-over-year, suggesting increased spending per customer. Porto has an average check of 18 EUR, while Lisbon's is 17 EUR. The average check fluctuated between 16.77 EUR and 19.50 EUR from April to June 2025.
Outlet count indicates market reach, reflecting brand expansion and accessibility to customers in different geographic locations.
Ramen Shifu has one outlet each in Porto and Lisbon. This indicates a focused presence in these key counties, suggesting potential for further expansion across Portugal.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals, informing strategies to differentiate and capture market share in a competitive landscape.
Ramen Shifu's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation include Burger King (5.41%), Casa Guedes (4.05%), 3 Amigos (4.05%), Oceana Rooftop (4.05%), and Revolucion Craft Cocktail Bar (2.70%). These brands represent alternative dining and entertainment options for Ramen Shifu's customers.
Traffic workload analysis by hour identifies peak times, enabling optimized staffing and resource allocation to improve customer experience.
Ramen Shifu experiences peak traffic between 12:00 and 22:00, with the highest workload occurring at 20:00 (64.05%) and 21:00 (63.48%). The lowest traffic is during the early morning hours (0:00-10:00).
Understanding consumer segments allows tailored marketing, increasing engagement by aligning with preferences of distinct groups.
Ramen Shifu's customer base shows a high affinity towards women (98) and men (101). Gen Z is over-indexed (176), indicating high engagement, while Gen Y is also over-indexed (113). Gen X is under-indexed (88).