Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Little Beet is in the top 4% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Little Beet performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Little Beet performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Little Beet' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Little Beet' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand’s share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the Cafe & Restaurants industry.
Little Beet's MARKET PERFORMANCE is at the 96th percentile, indicating a leading position. This means Little Beet captures a significant portion of customer traffic. Performance peers in the same percentile range include James Ranch, Levant Coffee, A Toda Madre Mexican Kitchen, Sushi Bichi, Ixtapa Mexican Restaurant, and Elia Mediterranean Restaurant.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) indicates brand loyalty and service quality, directly impacting repeat business and positive word-of-mouth referrals.
Little Beet's overall CSAT is 86%, up by 10.4 percentage points year-over-year. District of Columbia shows 88%, a decrease of 6pp, while New York shows 86%, an increase of 13.4pp. The CSAT dynamic data shows a fluctuating satisfaction level between April and June 2025.
Average check reflects customer spending habits, essential for revenue forecasting and menu optimization to boost profitability.
Little Beet's overall average check is $16.90, a decrease of 45.4% year-over-year. In New York, the average check is $17.00 with 0% growth. Dynamic data shows average check fluctuating between $16.25 and $16.75 from April to June 2025.
Outlet count shows brand's reach, influencing market share and accessibility for customers, indicating potential for growth.
Little Beet has 12 outlets. New York has 9 outlets, Connecticut, New Jersey and District of Columbia each have 1. New York accounts for 75% of Little Beet's total outlets.
Competitor analysis reveals market rivalry, aiding in strategic positioning to gain a competitive edge and attract more customers.
Little Beet's top competitors include Call Your Mother Deli, Just Salad, Yard House, McDonald's, and 787 Coffee, each with a cross-visitation rate of 4.55%. This indicates the percentage of Little Beet's customers also visiting these brands.
Understanding traffic patterns helps optimize staffing and resources, ensuring efficient operations during peak hours and enhancing customer experience.
Little Beet experiences peak traffic between 11 AM and 8 PM, with the highest workload at 12 PM and 1 PM (58.39% and 58.93% respectively). Traffic is minimal before 10 AM and after 9 PM. This informs staffing and resource allocation.
Understanding consumer segments enables personalized marketing strategies and product offerings, increasing engagement and brand relevance.
Little Beet's consumer base shows a high affinity with women (index 88) and men (index 110). Gen Y (index 125) and Gen X (index 103) are overrepresented, while Gen Z (index 68) shows a lower affinity. This suggests the brand resonates more strongly with Gen X and Y.