Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Hesburger is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Hesburger performance in the Lithuania and how they change over time
See what factors influence Hesburger performance in the Lithuania and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Hesburger' competitors in the Lithuania
An analysis of Hesburger' competitors in the Lithuania
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market Performance percentile reveals the brand's share of foot traffic, showing competitive strength and customer preference within the industry.
Hesburger, with a Market Performance percentile of 99 in Lithuania's Cafe & Restaurants industry, is a leading brand. This indicates a strong market position. Performance peers in a similar range include McDonald's, Grill London, Salsa duo-bistro, Čili Pizza, Dodo Pizza and Etno Dvaras.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects brand perception. Tracking overall CSAT and location-based data shows the brand's strengths and weaknesses.
Hesburger's overall CSAT in Lithuania is 45%, a 0.3 percentage point increase year-over-year. Siauliai County has the highest CSAT at 67%, while Alytus County experienced a CSAT decrease. Customer satisfaction is growing slowly between April and June 2025.
Average check (revenue per transaction) directly impacts revenue. Monitoring overall trends and regional differences pinpoints opportunities for growth.
Hesburger's overall average check in Lithuania is 9.5 EUR, a 0.5% increase year-over-year. Panevezys County has the highest average check at 11 EUR, while Kaunas County reports 8.9 EUR. The average check is steadily growing from April to June 2025.
Outlet count indicates market reach and brand presence. Analyzing the distribution of outlets reveals expansion and regional saturation.
Hesburger has the most outlets in Vilnius County (20) and Kaunas County (19) in Lithuania. Taurage County and Telsiai County has one outlet each. This shows concentration in larger urban areas.
Identifying top competitors based on cross-visitation data informs competitive strategies. It reveals which brands attract similar customers.
Hesburger's top competitors in Lithuania, based on customer cross-visitation, are McDonald's (11.34%), Grill London (6.71%), Čili Pizza (3.94%), Jammi (3.24%) and Pizza Express (3.01%).
Analyzing traffic workload by hour of day (HOD) optimizes staffing, resource allocation, and promotional timing. Traffic volume shows potential for revenue.
Hesburger's peak traffic hours in Lithuania are between 11:00 and 19:00, with the highest workload at 13:00. Traffic volume is minimal between 0:00 and 8:00, indicating low business activity during these hours.
Understanding consumer demographics (gender and generation) allows for targeted marketing. This enhances campaign effectiveness and brand positioning.
Hesburger's customer base in Lithuania shows a higher affinity towards women (74% of average) and men (117% of average). Generational analysis reveals high affinity from Gen X (103% of average), Gen Y (91% of average) and Gen Z (113% of average).