Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Ego at The is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Ego at The performance in the United Kingdom and how they change over time
See what factors influence Ego at The performance in the United Kingdom and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Ego at The' competitors in the United Kingdom
An analysis of Ego at The' competitors in the United Kingdom
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's foot traffic share, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Ego at The, with a market performance of 99, is a leading brand, in the top 1%. This signifies strong customer preference. Peers O'Neills, Fatt Pundit, Comptoir Libanais, Fat Hippo, Maki & Ramen and Big Easy are at the same level.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) is key for loyalty. Tracking CSAT by location helps identify areas for service improvements and boost brand affinity.
Ego at The boasts an 87% overall CSAT, up 11.1pp year-over-year, showcasing enhanced customer experiences. Wales leads with 92%, England with 87%, indicating positive sentiment across regions. The upward trend from April to June 2025 confirms growing satisfaction.
Average check reflects spending per customer. Monitoring trends helps optimize pricing strategies and identify upsell opportunities to boost revenue.
Ego at The's average check is £39.4, up 9.1% year-over-year, signaling increased spending. England's average is £39.4, while Wales stands at £39.3. A slight decline from April to June 2025 suggests potential adjustments in customer spending habits.
Outlet count indicates brand reach. Analyzing distribution by location reveals market penetration and informs expansion strategies for growth.
Ego at The operates 31 outlets: 29 in England and 2 in Wales. The distribution highlights England as the primary market, suggesting room for growth and expansion in Wales and potentially other regions.
Knowing top competitors, based on shared customers, aids in refining marketing and service strategies to strengthen brand loyalty and attract new customers.
Ego at The's top competitors include JD Wetherspoon (6.53%), McDonald's (5.35%), Miller & Carter (3.37%), Prezzo Italian Restaurant (2.18%), and Harvester (1.98%). These brands share a customer base with Ego at The, indicating possible competitive overlap.
Traffic workload distribution by hour highlights peak times, enabling optimal staffing and resource allocation to enhance customer experiences.
Ego at The experiences peak traffic between 11 AM and 10 PM, with the highest workload between 2 PM and 7 PM. Minimal activity occurs overnight (0-8 AM), suggesting targeted resource allocation during peak hours.
Understanding consumer segments by gender and generation is vital for targeted marketing and tailored positioning, increasing marketing ROI.
Ego at The has a high affinity with Women (112 index), and Gen X (141 index), indicating they are overrepresented compared to the average consumer. Men (92 index), Gen Y (67 index) and Gen Z (76 index) have lower representation.