Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Crazy Pizza is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Crazy Pizza performance in the Saudi Arabia and how they change over time
See what factors influence Crazy Pizza performance in the Saudi Arabia and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Crazy Pizza' competitors in the Saudi Arabia
An analysis of Crazy Pizza' competitors in the Saudi Arabia
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance reveals competitive strength and customer preference, highlighting brand's share of foot traffic within the cafe & restaurant industry.
Crazy Pizza, with a market performance percentile of 99, holds a leading position in Saudi Arabia's cafe & restaurant sector. This indicates strong competitive strength. Performance peers include ساين, جوزهند لاونج, 北海道 Hokkaido Restaurant المطعم هوكايدو, Avenue, ZULU and Taco Map all with a market position of 99 percentile.
Customer satisfaction is crucial for loyalty and growth. Tracking CSAT helps understand customer sentiment and identify areas for improvement.
Crazy Pizza demonstrates high customer satisfaction in Saudi Arabia, with an overall CSAT of 85%, a 7.4 percentage point increase year-over-year. In the Riyadh Region, CSAT is also 85%, reflecting positive customer experiences.
Average check reflects customer spending habits, influencing revenue and profitability. Monitoring it helps optimize pricing strategies.
Crazy Pizza's overall average check in Saudi Arabia is 220.6 SAR, representing a decrease of 1.9% year-over-year. The average check in the Riyadh Region is 220.6 SAR. This suggests a potential need to re-evaluate pricing or promotions.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market presence. Monitoring this metric reflects expansion and investment.
Crazy Pizza has 2 outlets in the Riyadh Region of Saudi Arabia. This indicates a focused presence in this area, with potential for future expansion.
Identifying key competitors is essential for strategic positioning. Understanding cross-visitation patterns informs marketing efforts.
The top competitors for Crazy Pizza based on customer cross-visitation are Urth Caffé (5.80%), McDonald's (5.12%), Public (3.75%), Starbucks (3.07%), and Half Million (2.73%). This reveals the alternative choices Crazy Pizza's customers consider.
Understanding traffic workload by hours helps optimize staffing and resource allocation, ensuring smooth operations.
Crazy Pizza experiences peak traffic workload between 18:00 and 22:00, with the highest traffic at 21:00 (66.93) and 22:00 (66.71). Lowest traffic hours are between 1:00 and 11:00, indicating a need to adjust staffing accordingly.
Analyzing consumer segments enables targeted marketing. Understanding gender and generation mix optimizes marketing and positioning strategies.
Crazy Pizza’s consumer base shows a higher affinity among women (Index: 165, overrepresented) compared to men (Index: 74, underrepresented). Gen Z demonstrates very high affinity (Index: 452, strongly overrepresented), while Gen Y shows a comparatively average affinity (Index: 48, underrepresented).