Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Common Grounds is in the top 2% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Common Grounds performance in the Indonesia and how they change over time
See what factors influence Common Grounds performance in the Indonesia and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Common Grounds' competitors in the Indonesia
An analysis of Common Grounds' competitors in the Indonesia
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance reflects brand's share of foot traffic, revealing competitive strength and customer preference in the Cafe & Restaurants industry.
Common Grounds holds a leading market performance percentile of 98 in Indonesia's Cafe & Restaurants industry. This indicates a very strong market standing, placing it in the top 2% of brands. Performance peers include: Lind's Ice Cream & Resto, Rimba Cafe, Yakiniku Like Lippo Mall Puri, Shem Sushi, Rumah Makan Sunda Saung Nyimas, and RICY Eatery & Coffee which share a similar market position.
Customer satisfaction indicates brand health, influencing loyalty and repeat business. Tracking changes helps proactively address issues.
Customer satisfaction for Common Grounds is 75%, with a decrease of 11.4 percentage points year-over-year. This decline suggests a need to investigate and address factors impacting customer experience to prevent further erosion of satisfaction levels. Java region mirrors the overall CSAT at 75% with the same negative trend.
Average check reflects spending per customer, impacting revenue and profitability. Monitoring trends informs pricing and promotional strategies.
The average check for Common Grounds is 100K IDR, decreasing by 18.1% compared to the previous year. This indicates customers are spending less per visit, possibly due to economic factors or changing order habits. The Java region reports an average check of 100K IDR with 0% of the growth.
Outlet count indicates market reach. Growth reflects expansion strategy and potential for increased revenue and brand visibility.
Common Grounds has 14 outlets in Indonesia, with 13 located in Java and 1 in Sumatra. Java has the majority of outlets. This distribution highlights Java as the primary market.
Identifying top competitors helps understand the competitive landscape and benchmark performance to maintain a competitive edge.
The top competitors for Common Grounds, based on customer cross-visitation, are Starbucks (7.07%), Giyanti Coffee Roastery (4.04%), Anomali Coffee (4.04%), Toko Kopi TUKU (4.04%), and Fore Coffee (3.03%). Starbucks has the highest overlap in customer base, indicating a significant direct competitor.
Traffic workload by hour reveals peak times. Optimizing staffing and resources based on this leads to better service and resource allocation.
Traffic workload for Common Grounds peaks between 11 AM and 4 PM, with the highest traffic workload at 2 PM (58.59%). Traffic is minimal before 7 AM and after 9 PM, suggesting adjustments of opening times could be possible.
Understanding consumer segments informs targeted marketing. Tailoring strategies by gender and generation increases engagement and ROI.
Women exhibit a high affinity (69) for Common Grounds, while men are over-indexed (125), indicating a stronger preference relative to the average consumer. Gen X has an index of 102, Gen Y of 116, and Gen Z has under-indexed (67), relative to the average consumer, implying differing levels of engagement across generations.