Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
365 Sakaba is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence 365 Sakaba performance in the Japan and how they change over time
See what factors influence 365 Sakaba performance in the Japan and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of 365 Sakaba' competitors in the Japan
An analysis of 365 Sakaba' competitors in the Japan
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance percentile shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference.
365 Sakaba, with a market performance of 99, is a leading brand. This high percentile signifies a substantial market share, indicating strong customer preference. Performance peers in the same range: Sushi Kizaemon, churrasco restaurant ALEGRIA GINZA, 食処さんぞくや, Rideon, おすすめ屋 神戸三宮店, Daishogun.
Customer Satisfaction shows how much customers like the brand. High CSAT means customers are happy and loyal, which drives growth.
365 Sakaba boasts an overall customer satisfaction of 86%, up 10.9 percentage points year-over-year. Osaka Prefecture shows high satisfaction (83%), while Kanagawa Prefecture shows decreased satisfaction (69%). CSAT varied between 76.36% and 90.16% during the observed period.
Average Check shows how much customers spend per visit. It helps understand revenue trends and customer spending habits.
365 Sakaba's overall average check is 2.5K JPY, a decrease of 3.9% year-over-year. Kanagawa Prefecture average check is 2.5K JPY, while Osaka Prefecture is 2.2K JPY. Average check fluctuated between 2423.08 JPY and 2500 JPY during the observed period.
Number of Outlets indicates the brand's presence and reach. More outlets can mean more customers and higher revenue.
365 Sakaba has a presence in multiple prefectures. Kanagawa Prefecture has the most outlets (4), followed by Osaka Prefecture (2), then Kyoto and Hiroshima Prefectures (1 each). This distribution indicates the brand's geographic footprint.
Knowing top competitors reveals direct rivals for customer attention. It helps in refining the brand strategy and marketing efforts.
The top competitors for 365 Sakaba, based on cross-visitation, include McDonald's (16.44%), 店 (10.96%), Gyoza no Ohsho (6.85%), Matsuya (5.48%), and Kushikatsu Tanaka (5.48%). This data shows which brands share customers with 365 Sakaba.
Traffic Workload highlights peak hours, showing when the brand is most busy. It helps with staffing and resource management.
365 Sakaba experiences peak traffic workload between 18:00 and 21:00, with the highest activity around 20:00. Traffic workload is minimal between 04:00 and 11:00. This information is useful for optimizing staffing levels and promotions.
Understanding consumer segments by gender and generation enables targeted marketing and positioning, enhancing engagement and ROI.
Women are overrepresented among 365 Sakaba's consumer base (Affinity Index 87), while Men are overrepresented (Affinity Index 107). Gen Z is highly represented (Affinity Index 121), while Gen X (67) and Gen Y (94) are underrepresented.