Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
1944 The Hocco Kitchen is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence 1944 The Hocco Kitchen performance in the India and how they change over time
See what factors influence 1944 The Hocco Kitchen performance in the India and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of 1944 The Hocco Kitchen' competitors in the India
An analysis of 1944 The Hocco Kitchen' competitors in the India
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance reveals brand's share of foot traffic, indicating its competitive strength and customer preference in the cafe & restaurant industry.
1944 The Hocco Kitchen is a leading brand with a market performance percentile of 99 in India's Cafe & Restaurants. This indicates a strong market standing relative to competitors. Performance peers in the same range: Polar Bear, Abhilasha Fine-Dine Restaurant, The Dineroom, Napoli Jaipur, Grand dreams, and Green Spoon.
Customer satisfaction reflects brand perception, influencing loyalty and repeat business, crucial for sustained success in the competitive restaurant sector.
Customer satisfaction for 1944 The Hocco Kitchen is at 82%, a 7.5 percentage point increase year-over-year. Gujarat shows high satisfaction (86%) with growth, while Rajasthan shows lower satisfaction (31%) with a decrease. CSAT peaked in June 2025 at 91.22%.
Average check measures customer spending per visit, a key indicator of pricing strategy effectiveness and customer willingness to spend at the restaurant.
The overall average check for 1944 The Hocco Kitchen is 938.8 INR, a 15.1% increase year-over-year. In Gujarat, the average check is 934.2 INR with no growth. The average check peaked in May 2025 at 1004.85 INR.
Outlet count indicates brand's physical presence and expansion, reflecting market reach and potential for revenue generation across different locations.
1944 The Hocco Kitchen has 12 outlets in Gujarat and 1 in Rajasthan. The majority of the brand's physical presence is concentrated in Gujarat, suggesting a strategic focus on this state.
Competitor analysis identifies key players vying for the same customer base, informing strategic decisions on differentiation and competitive positioning.
Top competitors for 1944 The Hocco Kitchen based on customer cross-visitation are Tea Post (7.32%), Domino's Pizza (5.69%), Honest Restaurant (4.88%), Sankalp Restaurant (4.07%), and La Pino'z Pizza (4.07%). These brands attract customers who also visit 1944 The Hocco Kitchen.
Traffic workload patterns reveal peak and off-peak hours, allowing for optimized staffing, resource allocation, and promotional strategies to maximize efficiency.
Traffic workload for 1944 The Hocco Kitchen peaks between 19:00 and 21:00, reaching 62.91% at 20:00, indicating the busiest hours. Traffic is minimal between midnight and 9:00. Resource planning should align with these peak hours.
Understanding consumer segments allows targeted marketing, enhancing relevance and effectiveness to different demographic groups, improving engagement and ROI.
Women are overrepresented in the customer base of 1944 The Hocco Kitchen (89). Men are also overrepresented (103). Gen X (156) is significantly overrepresented, while Gen Y (90) and Gen Z (61) are underrepresented.