Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
See what factors influence Chicken HUT performance in the Ukraine and how they change over time
See what factors influence Chicken HUT performance in the Ukraine and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafés & Restaurants
In Cafés & Restaurants
An analysis of Chicken HUT' competitors in the Ukraine
An analysis of Chicken HUT' competitors in the Ukraine
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Search among the top brands by number of locations
In Cafés & Restaurants
·Jun – Aug 25
Chicken HUT is in the top 3% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
Cafés & Restaurants
MARKET PERFORMANCE shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the cafe & restaurants industry.
Chicken HUT holds a leading position with a market performance of 97, placing it in the top 3% of brands in Ukraine's Cafe & Restaurants industry. This indicates a strong competitive edge. Its performance peers in a similar range include Milk Pub, Jek, Kachka, Panda Place Central, Gremio Grill, and Bar Nomer Try, all holding a position of 97.
Customer satisfaction (CSAT) reflects loyalty and brand perception, influencing repeat business and word-of-mouth referrals, critical for growth.
Chicken HUT's overall customer satisfaction is 66%, a decrease of 12.1 percentage points year-over-year. Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast shows high satisfaction (71%), while Zakarpattia and Ternopil Oblasts show decreased satisfaction (57% and 25% respectively). Improving satisfaction in underperforming regions is crucial.
Average check measures customer spending per visit, crucial for revenue optimization and understanding pricing effectiveness.
The average check for Chicken HUT is approximately 296.67 UAH. Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast has an average check of 193.3 UAH. Because delta data for overall average check is null, it's impossible to get valuable insights.
Outlet distribution indicates market reach and accessibility, influencing brand awareness and revenue potential across regions.
Chicken HUT has 18 outlets in Ukraine. The majority (7) are located in Ivano-Frankivsk Oblast, while Volyn, Chernihiv and Zakarpattia Oblasts each have 2 outlets. The remaining 5 Oblasts has one outlet. Expanding strategically could improve market coverage.
Competitor analysis helps identify direct rivals and understand customer preferences, informing strategies for differentiation and market share gain.
Chicken HUT's top competitors, based on cross-visitation, are Don Yapon (16.67%), Nartsys (8.33%), Royal Hamburger (8.33%), Sultan-shaurma (8.33%), and Royal Kebab (8.33%). These brands attract a segment of Chicken HUT's customer base, signaling potential areas for competitive focus.
Traffic workload analysis optimizes staffing, marketing, and resource allocation by revealing peak hours and customer flow patterns.
Chicken HUT experiences peak traffic between 11 AM and 2 PM, with the highest workload around 1 PM (70.71). Traffic starts picking up around 8 AM and declines after 6 PM, with minimal activity between 10 PM and 7 AM. Adjustments in staffing and promotions during peak hours may improve service and sales.
Understanding consumer segments allows targeted marketing, optimizing messaging and offerings based on demographics for improved engagement.
Chicken HUT's customer base shows a roughly equal gender mix, with women slightly over-indexed (101) compared to men (99). Gen Z is significantly over-represented (426). Targeted marketing towards Gen Z is suggested.