Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Meat moot is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Meat moot performance in the Turkey and how they change over time
See what factors influence Meat moot performance in the Turkey and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Meat moot' competitors in the Turkey
An analysis of Meat moot' competitors in the Turkey
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Meat moot, with a market performance of 99 in Turkey's Cafe & Restaurants industry, is a leading brand. This percentile demonstrates high market standing relative to peers. Performance peers within the same percentile range include Şehr-i Urfa, Konya Kebap Evi, Roof Panorama Restaurant, Hector Coffee House & Lounge, Has Döner, and Felix, highlighting a competitive landscape at the top.
Customer satisfaction reflects brand perception and loyalty. High CSAT scores often correlate with repeat business and positive word-of-mouth.
Meat moot's overall customer satisfaction (CSAT) is 90%, a slight decrease (-0.1pp) year-over-year. Marmara Region shows higher CSAT (91%) with growth (0.8pp), while the Black Sea Region has lower CSAT (87%) with a decline (-3.8pp). CSAT decreased over the observed months.
Average check is a key indicator of revenue per transaction. Monitoring this KPI helps assess pricing strategies and customer spending habits.
Meat moot's overall average check is 1.2K TRY, down 1.8% year-over-year. The Marmara Region shows an average check of 1.2K TRY, while the Black Sea Region's average check is 1.1K TRY. Average check amount increased between May and June 2025.
Outlet count indicates brand reach and market presence. Expansion can drive revenue growth, while contraction may signal challenges.
Meat moot has 3 outlets in the Marmara Region and 1 in the Black Sea Region. This distribution reflects the brand's physical presence across different regions of Turkey.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals and their market share. This helps in refining strategies to gain a competitive edge.
Meat moot's top competitors, based on customer cross-visitation, are Hafiz Mustafa 1864 (8.84%), Baran Et Mangal (3.54%), Ahmet's Restaurant & Cafe (3.28%), İSKENDER (3.03%), and Anatolian (2.53%). Hafiz Mustafa 1864 has significantly higher cross-visitation.
Traffic workload indicates peak operational times. Understanding workload distribution ensures efficient staffing and resource allocation.
Meat moot experiences peak traffic workload between 7 PM and 9 PM, with the highest workload at 9 PM (58.24%). Traffic is minimal before noon, and gradually increases throughout the afternoon.
Understanding consumer segments informs targeted marketing. Tailoring strategies to specific demographics can improve engagement and ROI.
Meat moot shows a high affinity with women (82) and men (108). Among generations, Gen X is indexed at 100, Gen Y is over-indexed at 104, indicating high affinity, and Gen Z is under-indexed at 72, indicating lower affinity.