Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Kichiri is in the top 1% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Kichiri performance in the Japan and how they change over time
See what factors influence Kichiri performance in the Japan and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Kichiri' competitors in the Japan
An analysis of Kichiri' competitors in the Japan
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance shows brand's share of foot traffic, revealing its competitive strength and customer preference in the industry.
Kichiri, with a market performance percentile of 99, is a leading brand. This indicates a strong market presence and high customer preference compared to its peers like Haidilao Hot Pot, Kamo, Kanagari, TsukishimaMonja OKOGE Hachioji, Yataizushi, Sushi & Shabu-Shabu Yuzu-An, which are in the same percentile range.
CSAT reflects customer happiness, vital for loyalty and positive word-of-mouth. High CSAT often correlates with repeat business and brand advocacy.
Kichiri's overall CSAT is 89%, a slight decrease of 1.3pp year-over-year. Kyoto Prefecture has the highest CSAT at 95% with an 11.5pp increase, while Chiba Prefecture shows the lowest at 56% with a significant decrease of 35.1pp. This data highlights regional variations in customer experience that should be investigated further.
Average check indicates customer spending per visit, reflecting menu pricing, customer affluence, and the success of upselling strategies.
Kichiri's overall average check is 4.1K JPY, a 3.5% increase year-over-year. Chiba Prefecture has the highest average check at 5K JPY. Osaka Prefecture has the lowest average check at 4K JPY. This data can inform pricing and promotional strategies across regions.
Outlet count signifies brand reach and market penetration, impacting accessibility and brand visibility for potential customers.
Kichiri has the most outlets in Osaka Prefecture with 9 locations. Saitama Prefecture has 2 outlets, while Nara and Kyoto Prefectures each have 1. This distribution highlights the brand's stronger presence in certain regions, which can guide expansion strategies.
Competitor analysis identifies key rivals and customer overlap, informing competitive strategies to attract and retain customers.
Kichiri's top competitors based on customer cross-visitation are GYUKATSU KYOTO KATSUGYU (3.5%), Kichiri Namba-ekimae (2.5%), McDonald's (2.5%), Kushikatsu Tanaka (2%), and 店 (2%). This indicates that customers who visit Kichiri also frequent these establishments, revealing potential areas for competitive focus.
Traffic workload shows peak hours, enabling efficient staffing and resource allocation to maximize customer service and revenue.
Kichiri experiences its highest traffic workload between 17:00 and 23:00, peaking at 20:00 (57.29%). Traffic is minimal from midnight to 16:00. This data informs staffing schedules and promotional timing to optimize operations during peak hours.
Understanding consumer segments enables targeted marketing, tailoring products and messaging to resonate with specific demographic groups.
Kichiri's customer base shows high affinity towards women (96) and men (102). It indicates high affinity towards Gen X (116) and Gen Z (172) consumer segments, while Gen Y segment (90) is under-indexed. Targeted campaigns could leverage these insights to further engage each group.