Book a demo—
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions

Vinkal Chadha
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Search among the top café & restaurant brands by number of locations
In Cafe & Restaurants
·May – Jul 25
Honolulu Coffee is in the top 4% of brands
Sample of brands in the same percentile
See what factors influence Honolulu Coffee performance in the United States and how they change over time
See what factors influence Honolulu Coffee performance in the United States and how they change over time
Available by subscription
Available by subscription
An analysis of Honolulu Coffee' competitors in the United States
An analysis of Honolulu Coffee' competitors in the United States
Top-5 brands that brand's customers also visit
Discover your traffic workload during different times of the day
Join us for a demo where we'll discuss how Realytics can support your business growth and adaptability in changing market conditions
Managing Partner, Global Business Development
In Cafe & Restaurants
In Cafe & Restaurants
Search among the top 10,053 café & restaurant brands by number of locations
Cafe & Restaurants
Market performance percentile reveals competitive strength and customer preference, crucial for understanding brand share and growth potential.
Honolulu Coffee's market performance is at the 96th percentile, indicating a leading position in the Cafe & Restaurants industry. This places them in the top 4% of brands. Performance peers in a similar range include: Evil Czech Brewery and Public House, Capone's Coal Fired Pizza, The Turtle Club, Tio's Tacos, Gasquatch, Hudson Grill.
Customer satisfaction is vital for repeat business and positive word-of-mouth, reflecting the quality of service and products.
Honolulu Coffee demonstrates strong customer satisfaction with an overall CSAT of 85%, a 6.2 percentage point increase year-over-year. Guam shows 100% satisfaction, while Hawaii has 83%. CSAT fluctuated between 61.90% and 93.75% during the analyzed period.
Average check is a key revenue driver, reflecting customer spending habits and the effectiveness of upselling strategies.
The overall average check for Honolulu Coffee is $15.10 USD, a decrease of 0.8% year-over-year. In Hawaii, the average check is $15.20 USD, showing no growth. The average check values varied between $12.22 and $12.73 during the period.
Number of outlets indicates brand reach and market penetration, affecting overall revenue and brand visibility.
Honolulu Coffee has 9 outlets in Hawaii and 1 in Guam. Hawaii represents the majority of the brand's physical presence, while Guam accounts for a smaller portion of the outlet distribution.
Understanding competitors helps in strategic positioning, identifying threats, and discovering opportunities for differentiation.
The top competitors for Honolulu Coffee, based on customer cross-visitation, are: Island Vintage Coffee (14.52%), Giovanni's Shrimp Truck (8.06%), Kona Coffee Purveyors | b patisserie (8.06%), Yummy Huli Huli Chicken (6.45%), and Liliha Bakery (6.45%).
Traffic workload reveals peak hours and staffing needs, optimizing resource allocation and enhancing customer experience.
Honolulu Coffee experiences peak traffic between 9 AM and 4 PM, with the highest workload around 3 PM (57.57%). The lowest traffic is between midnight and 5 AM, indicating a need for staffing adjustments based on hourly demand.
Analyzing consumer segments informs targeted marketing, tailoring products and messaging to specific demographic groups for optimal engagement.
Honolulu Coffee's customer base shows a high affinity among women (85, under-indexed) and men (113, over-indexed). The brand's popularity also skews towards Gen Y (166, over-indexed) and Gen X (55, under-indexed).